The short History of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

Introduction

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), or Sepah-e Pasdaran-e Enghelab-e Eslami, was founded in 1979 following the Islamic Revolution in Iran. Established by the order of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the IRGC has grown from a revolutionary militia to one of the most powerful institutions in Iran, wielding significant political, economic, and military influence. This article delves into the history of the IRGC, examining its formation, evolution, and contemporary role in Iranian society and beyond.

 

Formation and Early Years

The Islamic Revolution of 1979

The IRGC was born out of the political and social upheaval of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which overthrew the Pahlavi monarchy. The revolution aimed to replace the pro-Western monarchy with an Islamic Republic guided by the principles of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist). Ayatollah Khomeini, the revolution’s leader, envisioned the IRGC as a force to protect the new Islamic order.

Establishment of the IRGC

In May 1979, the IRGC was officially established through a decree by Ayatollah Khomeini. Its mission was to act as a counterbalance to the regular military, which was perceived as loyal to the Shah. The IRGC’s early mandate included defending the revolution, suppressing internal dissent, and promoting the Islamic Republic’s ideology.

The IRGC initially operated as a loosely organized paramilitary force, composed of various revolutionary groups. Over time, it became more structured, with its own hierarchy, training programs, and specialized units.

 

The Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988)

Role in the War

The Iran-Iraq War was a defining period for the IRGC. When Iraq invaded Iran in 1980, the IRGC played a crucial role in defending the country. Unlike the regular military, which was better equipped and trained, the IRGC relied on ideological fervor and unconventional warfare tactics, including the use of basij militias—volunteer forces composed of young and untrained recruits.

The war not only solidified the IRGC’s role as a key military force but also elevated its political influence. By the end of the war, the IRGC had established itself as a parallel military structure to the regular armed forces, with substantial autonomy.

 

Post-War Expansion and Economic Influence

Diversification into the Economy

After the war, the IRGC expanded its role beyond military affairs, venturing into Iran’s economy and infrastructure development. The IRGC established the Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters, which became one of the largest engineering and construction firms in Iran. This allowed the IRGC to control significant sectors of the economy, including oil, gas, and telecommunications.

Through its economic activities, the IRGC gained immense wealth and influence, becoming a key player in Iran’s political and economic landscape.

 

Political Influence

The IRGC’s influence in politics grew significantly after the Iran-Iraq War. Many former IRGC commanders transitioned into political roles, with some holding key positions in the government. The IRGC also played a pivotal role in suppressing internal dissent, particularly during periods of political unrest, such as the 2009 Green Movement protests.

 

Regional and International Activities

Support for Proxy Groups

The IRGC has been instrumental in shaping Iran’s regional strategy, primarily through its Quds Force, which is responsible for extraterritorial operations. The Quds Force has supported various non-state actors across the Middle East, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine, and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria. These groups have been central to Iran’s strategy of projecting power and countering U.S. and Israeli influence in the region.

 

Involvement in Syria and Iraq

The IRGC played a critical role in supporting the Assad regime during the Syrian Civil War. It provided military training, advisory support, and coordinated the deployment of allied militias from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Similarly, in Iraq, the IRGC helped organize and train Shia militias to combat ISIS and exert influence over Iraqi politics.

 

Sanctions and Designation as a Terrorist Organization

International Sanctions

The IRGC’s activities have made it a target of international sanctions. The United States, the European Union, and other countries have imposed sanctions on the IRGC for its involvement in terrorism, human rights abuses, and ballistic missile development.

 

Designation as a Terrorist Organization

In 2019, the U.S. designated the IRGC as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), marking the first time a government’s military entity received such a designation. This move was part of a broader strategy to pressure Iran economically and diplomatically.

 

Domestic Suppression and Human Rights Concerns

The IRGC has played a significant role in domestic repression, including crackdowns on political activists, journalists, and ethnic minorities. Its Intelligence Organization, separate from Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence, has been involved in monitoring and suppressing dissent within the country.

 

Conclusion

From its origins as a revolutionary militia to its current status as a powerful political, military, and economic force, the IRGC has been central to Iran’s modern history. Its influence extends beyond Iran’s borders, shaping regional dynamics and drawing international scrutiny.

The IRGC remains a complex institution, embodying both the revolutionary ideals of 1979 and the pragmatic power politics of modern Iran. Understanding its history is crucial to comprehending Iran’s domestic and foreign policies.

 

References

  1. Abrahamian, Ervand. A History of Modern Iran. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  2. Milani, Abbas. The Shah. St. Martin’s Press, 2011.
  3. Cordesman, Anthony H., and Abraham Wagner. The Lessons of Modern War – Volume II: The Iran-Iraq War. Westview Press, 1990.
  4. Alfoneh, Ali. Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards Is Transforming Iran from Theocracy into Military Dictatorship. AEI Press, 2013.
  5. Levitt, Matthew. Hezbollah: The Global Footprint of Lebanon’s Party of God. Georgetown University Press, 2013.
  6. Ostovar, Afshon. Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Oxford University Press, 2016.
  7. Katzman, Kenneth. Iran Sanctions. Congressional Research Service, 2023.
  8. Human Rights Watch, Iran: The Machinery of Repression, 2022.
  9. U.S. Department of State, “Designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,” 2019.

Spreading Justice: A database of human rights abusers in Iran

Spreading Justice: A database of human rights abusers in Iran

For fifteen years HRA has maintained a victim-centric approach to documenting and reporting on human rights violations in the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI); The primary focus has been to document rights abuses and highlight the crimes perpetrated against victims. Through the years, while perpetrators have enjoyed widespread impunity, victims have endlessly struggled for justice

On the occasion of the International Day for the Right to the Truth Concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims, and alongside the adoption of the resolution on the situation of human rights in the IRI at the 46th session of the Human Rights Council, HRA launches Spreading Justice, a database of human rights violators in Iran.

At Tuesday’s closing of the Human Rights Council, organizations, member States, and activists alike called for an end to impunity in Iran.  Spreading Justice was created to equip the international community with a tool to work towards holding perpetrators accountable, increasing both social and political pressure, and ending the widespread impunity that is currently enjoyed throughout the country.

The database, housed at www.spreadingjustice.org, includes unique profiles of both individual and institutional violators; those well known as well as those that seemingly fly under the radar.

Who is included in the database?

While all known violators will be included, Spreading Justice is primarily focused on new human rights violations. While many individuals or institutions included in the database have been committing violations for several years, there are oftentimes recent events that have contributed to their place in the database. By placing a focus on recent events, researchers are better positioned to collect, document, and fact-check information on the violations in question.

Along with profiles of individual violators, such as Masoud Safdari, there are also profiles for institutional violators like the Tehran Islamic Revolutionary Court. Profiles of institutional violators are linked to the profiles of affiliated individuals, both individual violators, as well as individual and group victims. This feature aims to aid in establishing connections for research purposes. Similarly, when users click on a victim’s name, they are directed to a list of any violators within the database that may also be affiliated. 

While the existing profiles are complete, users are able to aid in the development of profiles by anonymously submitting additional information. Informed users are encouraged to submit both missing information and information on violators not currently included through an anonymous, easy to use and secure form. All information submitted through this form is verified for authenticity before being added to the database. Utilizing a tool created by a German University, users are also able to submit information on a wide array of physical appearance indicators. Facemaker, the tool mentioned above, mocks a virtual drawing of the violator based on user submissions. These submissions are compiled for internal comparative analyses.

HRA researchers have spent countless hours collecting, documenting, and verifying the information within the database. All of the information included has been through a strenuous fact-checking process and is verified for authenticity prior to being added. New profiles will continue to be added to the database in real-time as information is collected and verified.

All of the information, documents, and reports collected on violators are both online and stored internally via PDF. Requests for documents can be made through the Contact Us page.

How are the violators profiled?

Over the years, HRA has learned what information is most necessary for stakeholders when working towards holding violators accountable. The lessons learned were taken into consideration when building out the database. The individual violator profiles, where available, include a photo or photos of the violator, evidentiary documents (including witness or victim testimony and/or relevant multimedia), verified articles written by reputable media outlets that have mentioned the violator by name, and a detailed legal review written by Brian Currin, a leading expert in international human rights. One can also find information on work history, current residency, travel history, and educational background.

The profiles include basic information such as full name and any alternative spellings, date of birth, place of birth, and any current institutional affiliation. If a violator has known family members, such as a spouse or child, they are listed by name. Additionally, there is information on physical appearance including, eye color, hair color, height, and weight. Certain aspects of the basic and physical information are categorized into one of three levels of certainty: exact, partial, and approximated. Information categorized as exact is verified and precise. Partial is listed when some part of the information provided is unknown at the time of writing. The approximation category is used when HRA researchers have used approximating techniques with available information to offer a range. Institutional Violators are profiled similarly. Users also have the ability to toggle between both unit and date conversions.

Violators are tagged and searchable by documented victims, identified rights violations, and any relevant institutional affiliation. All of the profiles are available in a downloadable PDF format. Download links are located at the bottom of all violator profiles alongside a form to submit any missing information.

How does one use the database?

Spreading Justice is available in both English and Farsi. Users can search the database utilizing a variety of tagged violation indicators including torture, the right to life, labor rights, women’s rights, social rights, prisoner’s rights, the right to peaceful assembly, freedom of expression and thought, and more. These searches enable those focused on specific violation types to filter. One can also search tags by institutional affiliation such as the Tehran Islamic Revolutionary Court or the Iranian Cyber Police among others. The database is also searchable by victim name to assist lawyers or researchers working on specific cases. There is additionally an option to search by keyword. Users can find the main search tool on theSpreading Justice homepage.

Not simply a database

Spreading Justice is not simply a database, it also offers resources on Iranian power structures and judicial systems, unique reports and analyses on human rights violators in Iran, as well as statistical overviews including a breakdown of the situation of human rights in Iran by province and violation type.

Similarly to the profiles, all of the information found at spreadingjustice.org including statistics, resources, and reports will be updated regularly.


HRA encourages readers to share the Spreading justice database with their networks. For any additional information on Spreading Justice please contact Skylar Thompson, HRA Senior Advocacy Coordinator at [email protected]

The Court System of Iran

Based on the Iran’s constitution the Judiciary “should be an independent power”, which means no one shall be above the law “ultra vires”, however this is contradictory as based on article 57, the judiciary is under authority of the Supreme Leader and  The Supreme leader directly appoints the head of the judiciary (5 year renewable term), who then appoints the Chief Public Prosecutor, head of state chief inspectorate, head of Administrative High Court, and the head of Military Courts (Iranian constitution 1998: article 156, 172, 173, 174). According to article 160 of the Iranian constitution the head of the judiciary recommends candidates for the ‘Minister of Justice’ to the President who then choses one as the Minister of Justice.

There are two basic types of judicial investigations in Iran

  • Legal: these investigations are mostly around settling civil disputes. The legal investigations do not include cases where an act is a “crime” by law and rather its about complaints and disputes between citizens or citizens and a governmental institution.
  • Criminal: The criminal investigations, include cases where there has been a “crime” committed which is punishable by law.

Iran’s Court system consist of ‘General courts’ and ‘Special Courts’

  1. The General Court| دادگاه عمومی

The General Courts have jurisdiction over all cases unless the case falls under the jurisdiction of a ‘Special Court’.
1.1. Preliminary Courts | دادگاه بدوی

  • Civil courts: hears civil disputes which are not within the Dispute Settlement Councils jurisdictions.

‘The Dispute Settlement Council (شورای حل اختلاف)’ follows (1) cases such as properties of minors and those that have incapacities without any beneficiaries. (2) pecuniary disputes of under certain amounts in villages and cities (3) residential tenant evictions, and (4) determining wills or intestacy. All the appeals from The Dispute Settlement Council is heard at the General civil courts.

  • Second Criminal Courts | دادگاه کیفری (دادگاه کیفری دو)
    hears all criminal cases other than the ones that fall within jurisdiction of Special criminal Courts.  This courts are held by one judge.

‘Criminal Dispute Settlement Council’(شورای حل اختلاف کیفری) hears all the summary offences such offences which could result in less than 3 months of imprisonment. However, this body does not issue prison terms.

  • Family courts| دادگاه خانواده  
    hear all cases regarding family disputes and criminal investigations including: (1) Marriage (2) divorce (3) dowry (4) Allomony (5) Guardianship (6) Paternity, and (7) capacity 
  • Juvenile Court| دادگاه اطفال و نوجوانان
    This court is held for those under 18 and should be held by one judge and two social workers.
  • First Criminal Court or Criminal Court of the province| دادگاه کیفری استان (دادگاه کیفری یک)
    this court deals with criminal investigations where the prosecutor is responsible for making a case against the accused. Less serious offences are heard at the Criminal court while indictable offences are brought to the Criminal Court of the Province. This court generally has to be held by 3 judges, for crimes with possible capital punishments court session should be held with 5 judges present. This court hears the following cases: (1) Political and Press offenses, (2) criminal complaints against members of the official bodies such as parliament, ministers, judges, governors, etc. (3) general complaints against police, army, and intelligence ministry authorities, (4) crimes with possible imputation sentences, and (5) crimes with possible Capital punishments such as death penalty, stoning, and life in prison.

    1.2. Appeal Courts| دادگاه تجدید نظر  
  • Appeal Court of the Province: This court has family, Civil and Criminal branches and hears the appeals from the preliminary courts.
  • The Supreme Court: This is the highest court in both criminal and legal investigations. This court has supervision powers over all other courts and is responsible for assuring that all procedures and trials are uniform across cases. The supreme court has both Criminal and General branches and hears the appeals of Criminal Court of The Province and the Revolutionary courts. The jurisdiction of the supreme court also includes resolving disagreements between courts in judgement or interpretations of the law.
    * The head of the Supreme court serves a 5-year term and is nominated by the head of judiciary

2. Special Courts| دادگاه‌های ویژه
The special Courts have been established to have jurisdiction over specific cases such as clergies, militaries and Revolutionary.

  • Revolutionary Courts| دادگاه انقلاب

The revolutionary courts started their work, days after the 1979 revolution with multiple executions carried out before their procedure was written. It was on June 17, 1979 the first codes of procedure for the Revolutionary Courts were established. The first article of this code indicates that the leader of the Islamic Revolution has ordered establishment of office of the revolutionary Public Prosecutor and required numbers of Revolutionary Courts at administrative centers in every province.

On July 4, 1979 the Revolutionary council accepted the bill and the revolutionary courts jurisdictions was set to investigating counter-revolutionary crimes.

The revolutionary courts today are at the capital of each province and any region that the Head of Judiciary orders. They are under direct supervision of the Head of Judicial Distrit.

Revolutionary court hear the following cases: (1) crimes against national security, (2) Insulting the Supreme Leader or the Islamic Revolution Leader, (3) Conspiracy against the Islamic Republic, Armed Terrorism, destruction of institutions in order to undermine the government, (4) spying, (5) Drug Crimes, (6)embezzlement, non-sharia Activities, corruption, etc.

There are also some financial frauds that fall under the jurisdiction of the Revolutionary Courts such as smuggling artifacts, plotting to disturb national exports, disruption of monetary currency, etc.

  • Military Courts| دادگاه نظامی
    This court hears cases where the defendant is part of a security or armed force such as Army, Police, Gendarmery, or IRGC. According to article 172 of the constitution, the Military Court shall hear Crimes of Military forces only when they are in relation to Military or Security duties all other cases committed by these individuals should be heard in general and criminal courts.
  • The Clergy Courts| دادگاه روحانیت
    This courts hears all cases against Clergies.
  • Administrative Court| دیوان عدالت ایران
    This court is the Highest court that hears Administrative dispute. Its jurisdiction includes: (1) complaints of private parties against public administrators i.e. ministers and institutions, (2) cases against regulations, (3) cases of complains of public employees with about their employment, (4) hears appeal of preliminary administrative council.

Related َrticles and Sources:

  1. Lahidji, K. (N.A). The History of the Judiciary in Iran. Legatum institute
    OPEN PDF
  2. Rahmani, T. & Koohshahi, N. (2016). Introduction to Iran’s Judicial System. Journal of Law, Policy, and globalization (Vol45)
    OPEN PDF
  3. Daraeizadeh, B. (2010). Legal Commentary: Alook at Criminal Procedure in Iran. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center.
    OPEN PDF
  4. Zare, M. (2015). An overview of Iranian Legal System. Hauser Global Law School. Retrieved from: https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Iran_Legal_System_Research1.html

The History of the Law Enforcement Command of the Islamic Republic of Iran (FARAJA)

Introduction

The Law Enforcement Command of the Islamic Republic of Iran (FARAJA), formerly known as the Law Enforcement Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran (NAJA), is one of the most pivotal institutions responsible for maintaining internal security and public order in Iran. Established in 1991 through the merger of several military and security organizations, FARAJA has played a critical role in combating crime, ensuring public safety, and managing crises. This article provides an in-depth exploration of FARAJA’s history, structure, and operations, from its inception to its current role in Iranian society.

Historical Background and Establishment of FARAJA

Pre-Revolution Security Forces

Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran’s security and law enforcement responsibilities were divided among three main entities: the Shahrbani (urban police), the Gendarmerie (rural and border police), and the SAVAK (the secret police). The Shahrbani maintained security in urban areas, the Gendarmerie operated in rural and border regions, and SAVAK was primarily responsible for intelligence and counter-espionage.

Post-Revolution Changes

After the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran’s security landscape underwent significant restructuring. Revolutionary Committees (Komiteh-ye Enqelab) were established as parallel security entities to maintain revolutionary order and address internal threats. These committees worked alongside the traditional police forces but were often more ideologically driven.

Formation of NAJA (Later FARAJA)

In 1991, under the directive of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and with the approval of the Iranian Parliament, the Shahrbani, Gendarmerie, and Revolutionary Committees were merged to form a unified law enforcement body known as the Law Enforcement Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran (NAJA). In 2022, NAJA was rebranded as FARAJA (Law Enforcement Command), reflecting its evolving role in modern Iran.

The primary objective of this merger was to streamline operations, improve coordination among various security agencies, and establish a centralized command to address internal and external threats more effectively.

Responsibilities and Missions of FARAJA

Ensuring Public Order and Safety

One of FARAJA’s core responsibilities is maintaining public order and safety. This includes crime prevention, managing public events, and ensuring traffic safety in urban areas. FARAJA also handles security during national and religious ceremonies, which often attract large crowds.

Combating Organized Crime

FARAJA has been at the forefront of combating organized crime, including drug trafficking, human smuggling, and cybercrime. Specialized units, such as the Anti-Narcotics Police and the Cyber Police (FATA), have been established to tackle these crimes effectively.

Border Security

Through its Border Guard Command, FARAJA ensures the security of Iran’s extensive land and maritime borders. This includes preventing illegal crossings, smuggling, and infiltration by terrorist groups.

Crisis Management

FARAJA plays an active role in disaster response and crisis management. Its coordination with other government agencies during natural disasters, such as earthquakes and floods, demonstrates its capacity to mobilize resources quickly and efficiently.

Structural and Technological Developments

Structural Changes

Over the years, FARAJA has undergone significant structural changes to enhance its operational capabilities. New specialized units, such as the Cyber Police (FATA), the Prevention Police, and the Counter-Terrorism Special Unit, have been introduced to address emerging threats more effectively.

Technological Advancements

FARAJA has adopted advanced technologies to improve its efficiency. These include the deployment of surveillance cameras, smart traffic management systems, and sophisticated tools for combating cybercrime. The integration of modern technologies has significantly improved FARAJA’s operational readiness and its ability to respond to security challenges.

FARAJA’s Role in Key Events

Handling Protests and Civil Unrest

FARAJA has played a prominent role in managing protests and civil unrest. Notable examples include the 1999 student protests, the 2009 Green Movement, and the widespread protests of 2017, 2019, and 2022. FARAJA’s response to these events has often been criticized for its heavy-handed approach, but the organization maintains that such measures are necessary to preserve public order.

Anti-Narcotics Operations

Iran is a major transit route for drugs, particularly opium and heroin, originating from Afghanistan. FARAJA’s Anti-Narcotics Police have conducted numerous operations to intercept drug shipments and dismantle trafficking networks. These efforts have resulted in the seizure of large quantities of narcotics and the arrest of traffickers.

Criticisms and Challenges

Human Rights Concerns

FARAJA has faced criticism from human rights organizations for its handling of protests and alleged use of excessive force. Reports of mistreatment of detainees and suppression of dissent have been highlighted by international watchdogs.

Internal Challenges

FARAJA faces several internal challenges, including corruption within its ranks, resource limitations, and the growing complexity of modern crimes such as cybercrime and financial fraud. Addressing these challenges requires ongoing reform and investment in training and technology.

Conclusion

Since its establishment, the Law Enforcement Command of the Islamic Republic of Iran (FARAJA) has played a vital role in maintaining internal security and public order. Its evolution reflects the broader changes in Iranian society and governance. Despite facing criticism and numerous challenges, FARAJA remains a cornerstone of Iran’s security infrastructure.

Understanding FARAJA’s history and operations provides valuable insights into the dynamics of law enforcement in Iran and its role in addressing both traditional and emerging security threats.

References

  1. Abdi, Amir. History of Security Institutions in Iran. Contemporary Insight Publications, 2006.
  2. Abrahamian, Ervand. Iran Between Two Revolutions. New York: Princeton University Press, 1982.
  3. Law Enforcement Studies Center. Structural Transformations in Iran’s Law Enforcement. FARAJA Publications, 2005.
  4. Research Center for Law Enforcement Studies. The Role of FARAJA in Crisis Management. FARAJA Publications, 2011.
  5. Heidari, Mohsen. The Role of Technology in Enhancing Law Enforcement Efficiency. Security and Development Quarterly, 2019.
  6. Strategic Studies Center of FARAJA. Analysis of Law Enforcement’s Role in Managing Civil Unrest. FARAJA Publications, 2020.
  7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Annual Report on Iran’s Anti-Narcotics Efforts, 2021.
  8. Human Rights Watch. Annual Report on Human Rights in Iran, 2022.
  9. Research Center for Law Enforcement Studies. Challenges Facing FARAJA in the Next Decade, 2022.